நாயன்மார் பற்றிய செய்திகள் 179 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79, 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86, 87. 88. 89. 30. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. '100. 10}. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. V. Ula, Lines, 139-142 S. 5 S. 9 S, 186-187 S. 4 347 of 1944 S.I.I. V, 456 S. 2, 32-34 Ꮪ, 2 Perumpam Attruppadai, II. 320-336 Samajam Edition, pp, 106, 137 K.A.N. Sastry’s ‘Cholas’ Vol.I. pp. 120-121 Ibid. Vol. II, part I, p. 432-433 Dr. C. Minakshi’s A........... Pallawas”, pp. 68 & 90 J.O.R., Madras, Vol. 6, p. 300 K.A.N. Sastry’s “Cholas Vol. II, part I, pp. 419–421 Sandisar Puranam, S. 40-43 S. 30.38 S.I.I. Vol. 12 Taduttatkonda Puranam, S. 42-62 . Sundarar Devaram, pp.42, 136, 137, 152, 158, 164, 178, 205, 250 “The Pandya and the Pallava inscriptions of the eight and early ninth centuries show a system, very similar, but not so quit developed, in operation throughout the Tamil country .............. The life and functioning of rurai institutions, the ultimate cells that sustained national existence, were clearly little affected by dynastic wars and the shifting of political power at the top”. - Prof. K.A.N. Sastry’s, ‘Cholas’, Vol. II, Part I, p.268 Appar Puramam, S. 27-28 Vellanaic carukkam, S. 37 - 38 376 of 1903, 141 of 1898; 174, 188 & 499 of 1911 Thiruvalangadu plates, S. 65-66 and 236 of 1902 K.A.N. Sastry’s “Cholas’, Vol.II, part I, p. 225 Ibid; “Pandyan Kingdom’, pp. 196-197 S. 798, 853 - 855 Aludaiyapillaiyar (1) Tiruvandadi, S. 28, 81 (2) Mummanikkovai, S. 4 (3) Tiruvulamalai, lines 145-148, 267-270 (4) Tirukkalambakam, S.I. 8, 9, 18 (5) Tiruthondar Thiruvandadi, S. 26, 60. Thiruvarangappadikam, S. 8 (Thirumalai) Ind. Ant. Vol. 8. p. 281 - Dr. Minakshi's Ad.......................... Pallavas’, p. 172 4, 20, 3 . Gananatar Puranam, S. 3-4 Appar Puranam, 413-415 350 of 1919; S.I.I. Vol. 7, No. 97
