பக்கம்:பெரிய புராண ஆராய்ச்சி.pdf/34

விக்கிமூலம் இலிருந்து
இப்பக்கம் மெய்ப்பு பார்க்கப்படவில்லை

சேக்கிழாரும் அவர் காலமும் - - 35 குறிப்புகள் 岑 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28, 29, “A critical Study of Sekkilar and his Historical material” Thiruthondar Purana Varalaru, S.98 Ibid. S. 24 S. 99 T.V. Kalyanasundara Mudaliar's edition Int, p. 6 S. 39; Tamil Polil, Vol. 3, P. 209 Idangaliyar Puranam, S. 2 & 3 Kalarsingar Puranam, S. 1 & 2; Aiyadigal Puranam, S. 1, 2 & 7 S. 46 This will be discussed in chap, 2 V. 26-,28 A.R.E. 1918, II, 34 S. I.I.II, p.20 Navalar edition and C.K.S. Mudaliar's edition, Vol. I V. 59, 58 and 52 Vide pp. 644 and 661 Vide pp, 6 and 37 Sen Tamil, Vol. 27, p.27 Prof. K.A.N. Sastry, in a similar context, observes : “In view of the tendency, common in Indian literature, of fathering minor works of unknown origin upon celeberted authors, and in view of the mediocre and commonplace character of these two works, we have to receive withgreat suspicion the popular legends on their authorship and the occasions for their composition* - Vide his *Cholas*, Vol. II part I, pp. 527-528 Sentamil, Vol. II. pp. 273, 386 R. Gopinatha Rao’s ‘Chola Vamasa Charitra Surukkam’ C.M. Ramachandra Chettiar's article in ‘Sentamil Selvi Vol. 10, pp. 132141; M. Raghava İyengar”s “Sasana Tamil Kavi, Charitam”, pp. 70-78; A.R.E. 1912, II, 27; A.R.E. 1918, p. 150, K.A.N. Sastry’s “Cholas’ Vol. II, Part I, р. 76 . V.S. Vandaiyar's article in Tamil Polil, Vol. 13, pp. 462-467. My esteemed friend Mr. T.V.S. Pandarathar also is of the same view C.M. Ramachandra Chettiar's valuable article in Sentamil Selvi, Vol. 10, pp. 132-141 and M. Raghava Iyengaris ‘Sasana Kavi chairtam', pp. 70-78 Vide Rajarajan Ula, fines 59-65 S. I.I. JII, p. 185 ff, Ep. Ind. Vol. 7, p. 5; K.A.N. Sastry’s ‘Cholas', Vol. II, Part I, pp. 65-66 I have visited all these places in April 1943 190 of 1907; See also Prof. K.A.N. Sastry’s article in the Acharya Pushpanjali” pp. 5-7 S. 59 S. 98